Did
you notice that both the Democratic and Republican National
Conventions were held in the South? This is but the latest evidence
of the success of the Republican Southern Strategy initiated by
Richard Nixon and Barry Goldwater. This strategy was a flagrant
exercise in racism and tapped the most heinous socio-political
sentiments that have beset this country.
It
was specifically the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights
Act of 1965 and the anger they generated in the South that the
Republicans took advantage of to turn the Democratic “Solid South”,
although a thorn in the side of progressives such as Franklin
Roosevelt, into a Republican Right Wing bastion.
However,
due to the shallowness of American political thinking, the South,
once inside the Republican Party, took it over. We have lived with
the consequences ever since. The Republican Party became the vehicle
for the spread of a long regionalized ethos of virulent racism, gun
toting pickups, “right to work” suppression of labor that brought
the New England textile mills to the South, the rebel railing against
government, the introduction of religious zealotry into politics and
a blind patriotism that made the South the preferred military
recruiting area for the all volunteer army. While all of these
proclivities can be found scattered among the American populace in
general, it is the South where they have been nurtured and
acculturated.
Is
this too strong an indictment? I don't think so. As a young soldier
in World War 2 I was stationed for awhile in 1943 near Tampa,
Florida. I saw the public drinking fountains and public restrooms for
whites only and blacks only. As a California boy, I was appalled that
this could be going on in the same country I was raised in. On a bus
I got up from my seat near the front to give it to a black woman
struggling under a load of purchases, a common courtesy in my home
state. I was sharply reprimanded by the bus driver and told to return
to my seat. Here it was, almost 80 years after the end of the Civil
War, yet American citizens, born free, were being made subservient to
others by law.
All
this is to point up the fact that the South, with an economy
dependent upon slavery, has returned to the distinction it made
between master and slave, that is between a superior and an inferior
class of human beings, at every opportunity. It
is to this kind of societal fault line that the worst in human
bigotry and cruelty gravitate.
Though the original arrangement was defeated by the Civil War, it
found a way through Jim Crow laws and share cropping to achieve much
the same end. When that was brought to a halt, wage slavery in the
form of right to work laws was used to attract industry to the South.
I am aware that New Englanders with their slave ships were deeply
involved in this despicable practice, but unlike the South the
general populace did not live with the immediacy of the South's
intense practice. I am also aware that it has been American
corporations who have taken advantage of Southern bigotry to profit
from the deprivations of low wage laws. Having set the standard in
the South, these corporations have gone on to exploit cheap labor
world wide.
A
basic irony in all of this is that the political party that had so
many of the abolitionists that fought slavery has become the party of
the ideological descendants of the slave-owning South. Witness the
current efforts of the Republican Party to purge voter rolls of those
without prescribed identification, striking heavily against poor
black people and that party's vigorous anti-immigrant efforts. Ari
Berman's Nation Magazine article How
the GOP Is Resegregating the South
is especially informative on this matter. It can be found at
http://www.thenation.com/article/165976/new-southern-strategy
The
recent book by Michelle Alexander and Cornel West titled The
New Jim Crow
details how Jim Crow segregation is being reintroduced through unjust
criminal codes including the war on drugs, deprivation of eduction,
etc. They have one chapter titled Thinking
Is for Mechanics, Not Racial-Justice Advocates
(the title of which I thoroughly disagree with) which articulates
problems requiring the most profound thought if massive unrest and
violence is to be avoided.
The
fundamental social characteristic of slavery and one that continues
to characterize its residue in the Republican Party is the pervasive
distinction made between classes of people. When these rigid
distinctions are made, especially along lines such as skin color and
ethnicity which cannot be changed, they become the areas of
exacerbated conflict to which many other issues gravitate. These
kinds of distinctions between people are so obvious that the
ignorant, the traditionalist, and the simple minded can be easily
convinced that they have some miscreant meaning. These distinctions
are the favorite tools of dictators such as Hitler's use of the Jews
to gain support for his Nazi regime. There are reasons why white
supremacists are to be found in the Tea Party.
Of
course the above condemnation of “the South” refers to an ethos,
not particular people; that would be the bigotry condemned herein.
Evidence of this can be found in progressives like Molly Ivins, Jim
Hightower, Ronnie Dugger, founding editor of the progressive Texas
Observer, all of Austin Texas, a city regarded by the majority of the
Texas legislature as another planet, as described by Molly. The
Southern Poverty Law Center in Birmingham Alabama is another brave
testament to progressive tenacity.
The
steady march of this Southern bigotry, albeit in a more sublimated
form, must be candidly and objectively evaluated, the full dimension
of its horrors laid bare, its current forms and future impacts
identified, those primarily responsible for the reintroduction of
American apartheid identified and a program of countervailing
legislation developed. A big order? Obviously yes. A necessity for
the preservation of American democracy? Equally obviously yes.
Bob
Newhard
No comments:
Post a Comment