When one becomes of an age, one can no longer be sure that common knowledge of his earlier years is still common knowledge. Some forty or fifty years ago Kris Kristofferson wrote a poignant song about loss and the meaninglessness of life titled Me and Bobby McGee. One line in that song that resonated heavily in those days was "Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose;" hence, the title of this post.
"Freedom" has been the watchword of the political right in this country designed to carry a massive burden of deception and destruction. It is high time Progressives start dealing with this term instead of shying away from criticizing such a foundation term for Americans.
Freedom has many meanings and those meanings are derived from the context in which the term is used. Absolute freedom in the real world verges on being a contradiction in terms. Absolute freedom would be the freedom of the jungle because this is the world of predator and prey in which only the predator is free. Only the tiger is free, every other creature's freedom is conditional upon not meeting up with the tiger. Does this remind anybody of corporate capitalism? It was this fear of more powerful animals that first encouraged humans to band together for mutual protection. Society was born of the effort to avoid absolute freedom; however, humans living in groups soon found that they needed rules, frequently in the form of taboos or religions. These rules, given the perversity of human nature, had to be enforced, hence the beginning of government. Thus human freedom has meaning only in the context of a society held together by some degree of force. With this understanding of the necessity of government, the next question is how much government. Mankind has fought violently over this issue. I think a useful way to address this issue is to go back to freedom's evolutionary roots, namely, mutual protection.
Mutual protection places a primacy on the group. A fundamental fallacy of the regressives is that one can have freedom without the group. This view, I believe, is considerably a consequence of technology's beneficent impact. In an earlier age, when the frontier was vast and wild, a few people ventured forth, but they formed communities as soon as they could and most people remained in cities and small towns. Go back three or four hundred years and most people in Europe were living in villages and towns. Go back to the Crusades, when most people lived in villages, these societies were so small and compact and fear of wandering too far from the village and its protection was so pronounced that many crusaders never found their way home. The point is that technology has permitted humans to live in such large groups and with a seeming independence of other humans that people now believe that the group is no longer necessary for their protection. In place of the mutually obligated group they now hire the police or arm themselves for individual protection to the detriment of the group. This is one of the ironies arising when humans become their own worst enemy.
One needs, however, to expand the awareness of threats to humankind to see the continuing need of group primacy. We have a planet of increasingly limited resources with a population of seven billion and counting and in which mankind has become its own worst enemy. The threat is enormous, so enormous that we must now consider all humans on this planet as part of a single group, sometimes called a global village. Freedom needs to be defined in the context of this group just as the first humans defined it within the context of the clan. We need the rules which will allow this global village to protect itself from itself. This, needless to say, is a new experience for mankind. It is why some people have argued that to avoid killing ourselves as a species we need an external enemy because that is what societal protection has always meant. There is no external enemy. The enemy is us as Pogo so observantly said.
The regressives have tried to divorce freedom from society and society's necessary governance. The logic is not there so they have used the emotional connotations of freedom to motivate people against their own government. A modicum of thought would quickly reveal that it is not the government that is the problem, despite Reagan's declaration to the contrary, it is who is controlling the government. Our War for Independence was not fought to turn people loose in the jungle as prey, but as the Constitution declares, to form a more perfect union. We wanted a society in which the people had a say in how they are to be governed, but governed they would be.
What does all this mean for Progressives? We must, I think, clearly and repeatedly demonstrate that there is no human freedom without government. We must measure a society by how much freedom is available to every citizen in the society, not just the affluent. We must understand freedom in much clearer terms than is currently the case. Freedom from fear is as essential now as when humans first formed their mutual defense against predators. Freedom from want is as necessary as freedom from assault, because severe want generates violence, not to mention the adverse impact on human development. In short, FDR's Four Freedoms should be added to our Constitution as rights of this country's citizens. There is, of course, no freedom if a single person, i.e. the tiger, is capable of destroying any and all others. Fear is a fundamental enemy of freedom, eclipsed only by the destruction itself. People feared Hitler and his Gestapo and military machine. What they feared was what millions experienced--death. This is why a dictatorship cannot have free citizens. We must make this clear to people
As noted above, we no longer have to fear predation by lions and tigers. We face corporate predators. The casualties of their predation are, in the popular mind, mainly "losers" not casualties. It is doubtful that early humans considered a clan member devoured by a lion a "loser." This is an indication of how grossly we have let corporate and wealthy America distort the popular perception. The corporation, now deemed a person, is the primary predator loose in our society. We must use our society to protect us from this predator as did our ancestors to protect themselves from their predators.
Bob Newhard
Saturday, February 19, 2011
Sunday, February 6, 2011
Sea Anchors
As you may know, a sea anchor is a device for stabilizing a ship in the grip of a storm. In the age of sail it was frequently a large sail thrown overboard with a rope attached to the ship. The sail's drag against the water provided sufficient resistance to wave and wind to create a modicum of stability.
As I read of the effort to crush the rising resistance in the Middle East, as I heard President Obama's State of the Union speech, which was so full of platitudes and irrelevancies, and as I read of the eighth secretive meeting of the Koch Brothers and their billionaire/millionaire allies in Rancho Mirage and the fact that two Supreme Court Justices (Scalia and Thomas) have been regular attendees of these political plotting soirées, I was, to put it mildly, at sea. An engulfing chaos seemed to be the reality of the day.
But then I heard Governor Jerry Brown's short, no nonsense, and very knowledgeable speech and read of the Common Cause-led, almost 1000 person protest at the Koch Brothers' event and asked myself "Is the left finally starting to find itself?"
The political left has been abandoned by mainstream politics in this country. The Democratic Party, the Lefts' traditional home, has, sometimes angrily, rejected it despite the critical role it played in getting Obama elected. Obama, like Clinton, is taking the Party to the center as fast as he can. There is nothing in the middle of the road, as Jim Hightower so uniquely said, but yellow stripes and dead armadillos. However, I believe that in the protest against the Koch Brothers' billionaires political plotting and in Jerry Brown's State of the State address the Left may yet mount a major resurgence.
Why so? Let me take the protest at Rancho Mirage first. The protest was reported to have had about 1,000 demonstrators. It was organized by Common Cause. They bussed demonstrators from all over Southern California. It was a well organized effort, but the thing that struck me most forcefully is that unions of low wage earners, e.g. janitors and domestic workers, were providing much of the transportation. The people, in a very basic sense, were involved. This indicated a major shift in union emphasis. In my youth unions were focused on manufacturing workers and as such they were organized in and through the plants where people worked. The corporate business community exported most of those jobs, so the unions began organizing the next lower tier of employee. These people did not work in one place. They worked in a variety of buildings and homes. Yet union membership and organization still worked. I found that fact very heartening. The poor of this country are finding institutions of an earlier age are still viable and they are willing to use them. However, there is a lesson for Progressives here. As with factory workers, until we have government focused on the people's and society's well being, technology will continue to be directed at eliminating jobs and eventually today's union members will face the same fate as yesterday's factory workers. This is why we need a developed, informed and articulated Progressive perspective. We have to stop reacting and anticipate the future. As Dennis Kucinich repeatedly pleaded in the 2008 Presidential election, "Wake up America, wake up" so we should be urging "Wake up Progressives."
Jerry Brown's State of the State address struck me as the first honest, developed, well communicated speech I have heard from a politician in many a decade. Gone were the shibboleths, the euphemisms, the deceptive use of language so common to current political speech. His strategy is solid for these times; take the budget issue to the people. He has made his recommendations and encourages others, so far with no success, to make theirs. As a case in point, he noted the massive resistance by local governments to his proposed elimination of redevelopment agencies. However, in an excellent display of honest politics, he pointed out that these agencies use this tax-payer-supplied money, which could be better used for schools and safety services. Academic research has shown repeatedly what most of us know, that municipal politics and decision making are far more controlled by the local business community than by any other segment. This pot of money, in effect, allowed the business community to spend tax dollars on whatever projects appealed to them. Is it little wonder that the Republicans don't want Brown's proposals, hard as they must be for all of us, taken to the voters?
As we float and bob in this sea of political and social chaos, caused mainly by the manipulations of excessive wealth that now engulfs us, it is both consoling and energizing to see a plank or two that we can grab onto. I think Common Cause and the unions involved in the protest of the Koch brothers' billionaires plot against democracy and the efforts of Jerry Brown to bring sanity and responsibility to California's government should receive strong Progressive support. The image of janitors and domestic servants opposing the third wealthiest people in the country after Bill Gates and Warren Buffet and a people's organization like Common Cause seeking a law suit to have Scalia and Thomas removed from the Supreme Court for unconscionable bias should be energizing to all of us. Let us turn these sea anchors into visionary Progressive foundations.
Bob Newhard
As I read of the effort to crush the rising resistance in the Middle East, as I heard President Obama's State of the Union speech, which was so full of platitudes and irrelevancies, and as I read of the eighth secretive meeting of the Koch Brothers and their billionaire/millionaire allies in Rancho Mirage and the fact that two Supreme Court Justices (Scalia and Thomas) have been regular attendees of these political plotting soirées, I was, to put it mildly, at sea. An engulfing chaos seemed to be the reality of the day.
But then I heard Governor Jerry Brown's short, no nonsense, and very knowledgeable speech and read of the Common Cause-led, almost 1000 person protest at the Koch Brothers' event and asked myself "Is the left finally starting to find itself?"
The political left has been abandoned by mainstream politics in this country. The Democratic Party, the Lefts' traditional home, has, sometimes angrily, rejected it despite the critical role it played in getting Obama elected. Obama, like Clinton, is taking the Party to the center as fast as he can. There is nothing in the middle of the road, as Jim Hightower so uniquely said, but yellow stripes and dead armadillos. However, I believe that in the protest against the Koch Brothers' billionaires political plotting and in Jerry Brown's State of the State address the Left may yet mount a major resurgence.
Why so? Let me take the protest at Rancho Mirage first. The protest was reported to have had about 1,000 demonstrators. It was organized by Common Cause. They bussed demonstrators from all over Southern California. It was a well organized effort, but the thing that struck me most forcefully is that unions of low wage earners, e.g. janitors and domestic workers, were providing much of the transportation. The people, in a very basic sense, were involved. This indicated a major shift in union emphasis. In my youth unions were focused on manufacturing workers and as such they were organized in and through the plants where people worked. The corporate business community exported most of those jobs, so the unions began organizing the next lower tier of employee. These people did not work in one place. They worked in a variety of buildings and homes. Yet union membership and organization still worked. I found that fact very heartening. The poor of this country are finding institutions of an earlier age are still viable and they are willing to use them. However, there is a lesson for Progressives here. As with factory workers, until we have government focused on the people's and society's well being, technology will continue to be directed at eliminating jobs and eventually today's union members will face the same fate as yesterday's factory workers. This is why we need a developed, informed and articulated Progressive perspective. We have to stop reacting and anticipate the future. As Dennis Kucinich repeatedly pleaded in the 2008 Presidential election, "Wake up America, wake up" so we should be urging "Wake up Progressives."
Jerry Brown's State of the State address struck me as the first honest, developed, well communicated speech I have heard from a politician in many a decade. Gone were the shibboleths, the euphemisms, the deceptive use of language so common to current political speech. His strategy is solid for these times; take the budget issue to the people. He has made his recommendations and encourages others, so far with no success, to make theirs. As a case in point, he noted the massive resistance by local governments to his proposed elimination of redevelopment agencies. However, in an excellent display of honest politics, he pointed out that these agencies use this tax-payer-supplied money, which could be better used for schools and safety services. Academic research has shown repeatedly what most of us know, that municipal politics and decision making are far more controlled by the local business community than by any other segment. This pot of money, in effect, allowed the business community to spend tax dollars on whatever projects appealed to them. Is it little wonder that the Republicans don't want Brown's proposals, hard as they must be for all of us, taken to the voters?
As we float and bob in this sea of political and social chaos, caused mainly by the manipulations of excessive wealth that now engulfs us, it is both consoling and energizing to see a plank or two that we can grab onto. I think Common Cause and the unions involved in the protest of the Koch brothers' billionaires plot against democracy and the efforts of Jerry Brown to bring sanity and responsibility to California's government should receive strong Progressive support. The image of janitors and domestic servants opposing the third wealthiest people in the country after Bill Gates and Warren Buffet and a people's organization like Common Cause seeking a law suit to have Scalia and Thomas removed from the Supreme Court for unconscionable bias should be energizing to all of us. Let us turn these sea anchors into visionary Progressive foundations.
Bob Newhard
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)